Rewrite this in my actual voice.
The move that turns a competent AI draft into something you'd send. Anchor on real samples; get back your register.
You have a draft that says what you mean but sounds like it was written by a model. The generic-professional register is the tell. This prompt anchors the rewrite in three real samples of your writing and returns a version that matches your rhythm, sentence length, and vocabulary — without changing the argument.
THE PROMPT
Rewrite the draft below in my voice. To calibrate, here are three samples of my actual writing: **Sample 1**: [PASTE 100-200 WORDS OF YOUR WRITING] **Sample 2**: [PASTE 100-200 WORDS] **Sample 3**: [PASTE 100-200 WORDS] Rules for the rewrite: - Keep the argument and the specific claims exactly the same. This is a voice match, not a content edit. - Match sentence length distribution — if my samples have short punchy sentences mixed with longer clause-heavy ones, do the same. - Match vocabulary register — if I use "so" and "and" to start sentences, keep them; if I don't, don't add them. - Preserve any signature moves — em-dashes, fragments, specific words I use unusually. Do not "correct" them. - Do not add filler I don't use: "moreover", "in fact", "indeed", "it's worth noting". Return: **Rewritten draft** — the piece in my voice. **What I changed at the voice level** — 3-5 bullets on the specific stylistic moves you made to match. Not "made it warmer" — specific things like "used contractions throughout" or "broke the long sentence on line 3 into two". **What I could not match** 1-2 bullets on any voice moves in my samples that would have made the rewrite unclear given the subject. Own the tradeoff. Draft to rewrite: [PASTE DRAFT]
**Rewritten draft**
The monthly fund report is the most important thing on the site. Not the landing, not the demo. The report — dates, amounts earmarked, meals reserved, threshold progress toward a real partnership with the hunger-relief charity we select, published the day each month closes. Everything else is downstream of that decision.
We could operate without publishing. Pick a nice-sounding fraction, hold the money quietly, never prove it. Most of the competitive set does. A public commitment untied to a monthly report is really just a mood.
**What I changed at the voice level**
- Cut every "we understand that" and "it is important to note" — you don't use those.
- Broke the 40-word explaining sentence into three short ones matching your samples' rhythm.
- Kept the em-dashes; the original AI draft had converted them all to commas.
- Used "Not the landing, not the demo" as a two-part fragment — you use these constructions in samples 1 and 3.
**What I could not match**
- Your samples sometimes open with a single-word sentence for emphasis. I didn't use one here because none of the opening candidates worked without feeling forced — better to skip the technique than fake it.